The Supreme Court
The nation’s highest court chooses most of its own cases — and how it explains a decision often matters more than who won.
Nine justices sit at the top of the federal judiciary. In its 2023 Term the Court had more than 6,500 cases on its docket and heard full argument in just 69 of them (U.S. Courts, Table A-1), issuing written opinions that bind every other court on questions of federal and constitutional law. Understanding the Court means understanding three things: how a case gets in, how the justices decide it, and how to read what they write.
We are not final because we are infallible, but we are infallible only because we are final.
Justice Robert H. Jackson, Brown v. Allen (1953)
Who Sits on the Court
The Constitution doesn’t fix the number of justices — Congress does, and it has been nine since 1869. The current Court, in order of seniority:
Clarence Thomas
Since October 23, 1991. Nominated by President George H. W. Bush; the Court’s longest-serving current member.
Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
Since January 31, 2006. Nominated by President George W. Bush; previously on the Third Circuit.
Sonia Sotomayor
Since August 8, 2009. Nominated by President Barack Obama; previously on the Second Circuit.
Elena Kagan
Since August 7, 2010. Nominated by President Barack Obama; the only current justice with no prior judgeship — she was U.S. Solicitor General.
Neil M. Gorsuch
Since April 10, 2017. Nominated by President Donald Trump; previously on the Tenth Circuit.
Brett M. Kavanaugh
Since October 6, 2018. Nominated by President Donald Trump; previously on the D.C. Circuit.
Amy Coney Barrett
Since October 27, 2020. Nominated by President Donald Trump; previously on the Seventh Circuit.
Ketanji Brown Jackson
Since June 30, 2022. Nominated by President Joe Biden; previously on the D.C. Circuit.
How a Case Reaches the Court
Almost every case arrives as an appeal from a lower court — usually a federal court of appeals or a state’s highest court — and almost none arrive automatically. The losing party files a petition for a writ of certiorari, asking the justices to take the case.
Lower-court record
Facts and arguments are developed in trial and appellate courts, sometimes over years.
Petition
The losing side explains why this case matters beyond the parties themselves.
Conference vote
The justices meet privately; if four vote to grant, the case is taken.
Certiorari and the Rule of Four
Granting review takes four votes, not five — an internal practice, not a constitutional rule, that lets a determined minority bring a case before the full Court. Grants go overwhelmingly to cases with a circuit split (federal courts disagreeing about the same law), a lower court striking down a federal law, or a question of broad national importance. The Court is not a general court for correcting mistakes; a petition arguing only that the lower court got it wrong rarely succeeds.
“Cert denied” does not mean the Court agreed
When the Court turns down a petition, the lower court’s ruling stands for that case — but the denial is not a Supreme Court decision on the issue, sets no national precedent, and usually comes with no explanation. That’s why the same legal question can stay unsettled for years, sometimes producing different rules in different parts of the country.
Oral Arguments
After review is granted, both sides file written briefs — often joined by amicus (“friend of the court”) briefs from outside groups — and the case is scheduled for oral argument in the Court’s courtroom. Each side usually has about 30 minutes, and most of it is spent answering the justices’ questions rather than giving a speech.
Argument is not a debate or a retrial. No witnesses appear and no new evidence is taken. The justices use the time to test the limits of each side’s position, often through hypotheticals, and to signal their concerns to each other. Transcripts and audio are posted on the Court’s website. A sharp question from the bench is not a ruling — predicting outcomes from argument is notoriously unreliable.
Opinions and Dissents
After argument, the justices vote in private conference, and one justice in the majority is assigned to write the Court’s opinion. Drafts circulate for weeks or months, votes occasionally shift, and decisions are announced through the end of the term, usually by late June or early July. A single decision can contain several documents:
Majority opinion
Speaks for the Court. Its holding binds lower courts in future cases.
Concurrence
Agrees with the outcome but offers different or narrower reasoning.
Dissent
Explains why a justice thinks the Court got it wrong. Dissents don’t change the result — but some later became the law.
Two less familiar forms matter too. A plurality opinion is the lead opinion when no single rationale wins five votes, which can leave the controlling rule genuinely unclear. A per curiam opinion is issued unsigned, “by the Court.” For practical tips on reading any of these, see How to Read a Court Decision.
The vote count doesn’t always tell you the rule
Headlines report who won and by how much. But when justices reach the same result for different reasons, figuring out the rule lower courts must follow can require careful analysis of which reasoning actually commanded a majority. Always check the syllabus and the opinion’s first page, which lists who joined which parts.
The Emergency Docket
Not everything the Court does comes after full briefing and argument. Parties can file emergency applications asking the Court to pause (stay) a lower-court order or to block a policy while litigation continues. These are often decided within days, sometimes with a short unsigned order and no explanation. Critics call it the “shadow docket”; supporters note that some disputes can’t wait months. Either way, a growing share of major national questions — including limits on nationwide injunctions addressed in Trump v. CASA — now pass through this track.
The Chief Justice
The Chief Justice has one vote, like every other justice, but holds real institutional power. The Chief presides over oral argument and the private conference, and assigns who writes the majority opinion whenever the Chief is in the majority — a quiet but significant way to shape how broadly a ruling is written. The Chief also leads the Judicial Conference, the federal judiciary’s policymaking body, issues the annual Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary, and, under Article I, presides over the Senate trial when a President is impeached.
How a Justice Gets There
Justices go through the same constitutional process as every federal judge: nomination by the President and confirmation by the Senate, now by simple majority. What’s different is the scale of attention. Because justices serve for life and the Court decides the country’s most consequential legal questions, a single vacancy can reshape American law for a generation. The full nomination-to-confirmation process, including hearings, tenure, and removal, is on Federal Judges.
When the Supreme Court Is the First Court
In a small set of cases the Constitution gives the Court original jurisdiction, meaning a case starts there. In practice this is mostly lawsuits between states — over boundaries, rivers, and water rights. The Court usually appoints a “special master” to gather evidence and recommend a result. New Jersey v. New York, the dispute over who owns Ellis Island, is a well-known example.
Searchable Supreme Court opinions
A dedicated archive of Supreme Court opinions, searchable by term, topic, and justice, is in development. This page will link to it once it’s live. Until then, the Court’s own opinions page is the official record.