The Federalist Papers
Founding Documents · Advocacy pieces, not neutral summaries
Eighty-five essays, published under one shared pen name, written to win over one skeptical audience: voters in New York, where ratification of the new Constitution was in real doubt in 1787 and 1788. Because they were written to win a political fight, they show how the Constitution’s own supporters explained and defended its design.
Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.
James Madison, Federalist No. 51
Three jobs they still do
Public argument
They were written for a real ratification fight. They are persuasive writing, not neutral explanation.
Structural defense
They explain why power was divided among the branches, between the national government and the states, and among separate institutions.
Interpretive source
Courts, scholars and public officials still cite them when they discuss what the Constitution’s design was meant to do.
Who wrote them, and why the secrecy
All 85 essays were published under the pen name “Publius,” after Publius Valerius, a consul credited with helping found the Roman Republic. The real authors were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. Hamilton wrote the largest share, Madison the second largest, and Jay only five, after illness slowed him. One shared name let the essays speak with one voice instead of three. The authors were not publicly confirmed until years later.
The essays ran in New York newspapers from October 1787 to August 1788, during New York’s own ratification debate. The outcome there was not certain. Anti-Federalist opposition was strong, and a New York outside the union would have split New England from the states to the south. The essays were practical persuasion aimed at a specific audience. Their lasting influence on how the Constitution is read came later.
These essays do not tell the whole ratification story
The Federalist Papers are not a neutral or complete account of the Constitution’s meaning. They are one side’s argument. The Anti-Federalists made serious arguments about federal power and individual rights, and those arguments helped lead to the Bill of Rights. Reading only the Federalist Papers gives one side of a debate that had two.
Why they still matter
Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, cite The Federalist Papers when they interpret what parts of the Constitution were meant to do. Judges who look to the Constitution’s original meaning rely on them often, because they explain the design at the time, from people who helped write it.
They are still the arguments of Hamilton, Madison and Jay. They do not speak for every delegate to the Constitutional Convention, and the same authors sometimes took other positions later. They are essential primary sources, but they are advocacy, not an official commentary.
Federalist No. 10 and the problem of faction
In Federalist No. 10, Madison argues that a large, varied republic is better protected against “faction” (organized groups pursuing interests against the rights of others or the good of the whole) than a small one. Many political thinkers of the time believed the opposite. Madison’s answer was that a large republic would hold so many competing factions that no single one could easily take control.
All 85 essays
Each essay has its own page: what it argues, the key passages, and the full text. Choose an author to see only the essays he wrote. Hamilton wrote 51, Madison 29 and Jay 5. Madison’s 29 include 12 that Hamilton and Madison both claimed (most historians now credit Madison) and 3 he wrote with Hamilton.
No. 1: General Introduction
Can people choose good government—or must they leave it to accident and force?
No. 2: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
Why remain one nation instead of dividing into several confederacies?
No. 3: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
Can one national government reduce the chances of war?
No. 4: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
Why does avoiding provocation require more than behaving peacefully?
No. 5: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence
How could neighboring American confederacies turn into rivals—and invite outside interference?
No. 6: Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States
Would shared republican government and commerce keep independent American states at peace?
No. 7: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States
What would independent American states actually fight about?
No. 8: The Consequences of Hostilities Between the States
If the states went their separate ways, what would happen to liberty at home?
No. 9: The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
Can a large union protect self-government better than small republics can?
No. 10: The Same Subject Continued: The Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection
How can a republic limit faction without destroying liberty?
No. 11: The Utility of the Union in Respect to Commercial Relations and a Navy
Can a united country bargain more effectively abroad?
No. 12: The Utility of the Union in Respect to Revenue
Why does economic cooperation matter to public finances?
No. 13: Advantage of the Union in Respect to Economy in Government
Would several national governments cost less than one?
No. 14: Objections to the Proposed Constitution from Extent of Territory Answered
Can a large republic still be governed by its people?
No. 15: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
What happens when a national government can only ask states to comply?
No. 16: The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
How should a Union enforce its decisions?
No. 17: The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
Would the national government naturally absorb every state function?
No. 18: The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
What does an alliance lack when its members can disregard common decisions?
No. 19: The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
Can formal union survive without effective common government?
No. 20: The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union
Why might a federation need more than unanimous agreement?
No. 21: Other Defects of the Present Confederation
What can go wrong with the Confederation’s basic safeguards?
No. 22: The Same Subject Continued: Other Defects of the Present Confederation
Why are commerce, representation, and courts part of the same institutional problem?
No. 23: The Necessity of a Government as Energetic as the One Proposed to the Preservation of the Union
Can government carry out a duty without adequate means?
No. 24: The Powers Necessary to the Common Defense Further Considered
Must peace mean an absolute ban on permanent forces?
No. 25: The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Necessary to the Common Defense Further Considered
Why not leave permanent defense forces to individual states?
No. 26: The Idea of Restraining the Legislative Authority in Regard to the Common Defense Considered
How can a legislature supervise military establishments over time?
No. 27: The Same Subject Continued: The Idea of Restraining the Legislative Authority in Regard to the Common Defense Considered
Must federal law depend mainly on military force?
No. 28: The Same Subject Continued: The Idea of Restraining the Legislative Authority in Regard to the Common Defense Considered
What if ordinary civil enforcement is not enough?
No. 29: Concerning the Militia
How should a common defense system organize citizen forces?
No. 30: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Can a government remain responsible if it cannot raise money?
No. 31: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
What follows from assigning government an important objective?
No. 32: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Does giving a power to the Union always take it from the states?
No. 33: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Do implementation clauses give government unlimited power?
No. 34: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Should a constitution assume tomorrow’s costs will resemble today’s?
No. 35: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Must every occupation elect a member of its own trade?
No. 36: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the General Power of Taxation
Can national lawmakers understand local tax conditions?
No. 37: Concerning the Difficulties of the Convention in Devising a Proper Form of Government
Why should readers expect ambiguity and compromise?
No. 38: The Same Subject Continued, and the Incoherence of the Objections to the New Plan Exposed
Should a proposal be rejected without comparing the alternatives?
No. 39: The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles
Is the proposed Constitution federal or national?
No. 40: On the Powers of the Convention to Form a Mixed Government Examined and Sustained
Could delegates recommend a constitution beyond narrow instructions?
No. 41: General View of the Powers Conferred by the Constitution
How should the Constitution’s grant of power be evaluated?
No. 42: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered
Why place commerce and cross-border rules at the national level?
No. 43: The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered
What supports the Union beyond commerce and defense?
No. 44: Restrictions on the Authority of the Several States
Why does a constitution both prohibit state acts and authorize implementing laws?
No. 45: The Alleged Danger from the Powers of the Union to the State Governments
Would stronger federal institutions make state governments unnecessary?
No. 46: The Influence of the State and Federal Governments Compared
Which government would people support in a conflict over power?
No. 47: The Particular Structure of the New Government and the Distribution of Power Among Its Different Parts
Does separation require branches to have no contact?
No. 48: These Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated as to Have No Constitutional Control Over Each Other
Can written boundaries prevent institutional encroachment?
No. 49: Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention
Should every serious branch dispute go straight back to the people?
No. 50: Periodical Appeals to the People Considered
Would scheduled conventions solve encroachment better?
No. 51: The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances Between the Different Departments
How can institutions check power without assuming virtuous officials?
No. 52: The House of Representatives
What keeps representatives connected to the people?
No. 53: The Same Subject Continued: The House of Representatives
Does accountability require annual elections?
No. 54: The Apportionment of Members Among the States
What did the three-fifths rule actually do?
No. 55: The Total Number of the House of Representatives
Can a small representative body avoid corruption and domination?
No. 56: The Same Subject Continued: The Total Number of the House of Representatives
How much local knowledge does national lawmaking require?
No. 57: The Alleged Tendency of the New Plan to Elevate the Few at the Expense of the Many Considered in Connection with Representation
Why should elected officials serve people unlike themselves?
No. 58: Objection That the Number of Members Will Not Be Augmented as the Progress of Population Demands
What would encourage the House to grow with the population?
No. 59: Concerning the Power of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
Could states disable the national legislature by refusing elections?
No. 60: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the Power of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
Could congressional election regulations entrench a favored class?
No. 61: The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the Power of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members
Why might a national election timetable matter?
No. 62: The Senate
Why give a second chamber different qualifications and terms?
No. 63: The Senate Continued
Can a slower chamber protect lasting public interests?
No. 64: The Powers of the Senate
Why share treaty-making between the President and Senate?
No. 65: The Powers of the Senate Continued
Why place impeachment trials in the Senate?
No. 66: Objections to the Power of the Senate to Set as a Court for Impeachments Further Considered
Does the Senate’s trial role give it too much power?
No. 67: The Executive Department
How can a misleading reading make the presidency look monarchical?
No. 68: The Mode of Electing the President
What did Hamilton expect presidential electors to accomplish?
No. 69: The Real Character of the Executive
How does an elected executive differ from hereditary monarchy?
No. 70: The Executive Department Further Considered
Can unity make an executive more accountable?
No. 71: The Duration in Office of the Executive
Should a President resist a temporary public demand?
No. 72: The Same Subject Continued, and Re-Eligibility of the Executive Considered
Why did Hamilton oppose an absolute bar on reelection?
No. 73: The Provision for the Support of the Executive, and the Veto Power
How can an executive remain independent while Congress controls legislation and money?
No. 74: The Command of the Military and Naval Forces, and the Pardoning Power of the Executive
Why give one executive command and clemency powers?
No. 75: The Treaty-Making Power of the Executive
Why is treaty-making neither ordinary legislation nor sole executive action?
No. 76: The Appointing Power of the Executive
How can appointments combine individual responsibility with review?
No. 77: The Appointing Power Continued and Other Powers of the Executive Considered
Can shared appointment power stabilize an administration?
No. 78: The Judiciary Department
Why should judges be able to refuse an unconstitutional statute?
No. 79: The Judiciary Continued
What makes judicial independence practical rather than merely formal?
No. 80: The Powers of the Judiciary
Which disputes belong in national courts?
No. 81: The Judiciary Continued, and the Distribution of the Judicial Authority
Why create a judicial hierarchy distinct from the legislature?
No. 82: The Judiciary Continued
Does federal jurisdiction automatically exclude state courts?
No. 83: The Judiciary Continued in Relation to Trial by Jury
Does silence about civil juries abolish them?
No. 84: Certain General and Miscellaneous Objections to the Constitution Considered and Answered
Why did Hamilton argue against adding a separate bill of rights?
No. 85: Concluding Remarks
Must a constitution be perfect before it is adopted?
The founding documents
The Federalist Papers argued for one of the founding documents of the United States. They are all on the site.
The Constitution
The plan of government, 1787.
The Bill of Rights
The first ten amendments, 1791.
The Amendments
All twenty-seven, with their full text.
The Amendment Process
How the Constitution changes, step by step.
The Declaration of Independence
Why thirteen colonies separated from Britain, 1776.
All founding documents
How the documents fit together.