Marbury v. Madison
The case became a foundation for judicial review and the role of courts in constitutional interpretation.
Could Congress give the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus in this kind of case, and could the Court refuse to enforce a statute that conflicted with the Constitution?
Marbury v. Madison began as a dispute over an undelivered commission, but it became one of the most important separation-of-powers cases in American history. The case arose during the transfer of power from the Federalist administration of John Adams to the Democratic-Republican administration of Thomas Jefferson. In the final days of Adams’s presidency, several judicial appointments were completed, but some commissions were not delivered before the new administration took office.
William Marbury asked the Supreme Court to force James Madison, the new Secretary of State, to deliver his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall’s opinion walked a careful line. The Court said Marbury had a legal right, but it also said the Court did not have constitutional authority to grant the remedy Congress had attempted to provide. That conclusion let the Court avoid a direct confrontation with Jefferson while announcing a much larger principle.
The lasting importance of the case is judicial review. After Marbury, federal courts claimed the power to decide whether statutes fit the Constitution. That does not mean courts answer every political question, but it does mean that constitutional limits are enforceable in court when a proper case reaches the judiciary.
Facts
William Marbury had been appointed a justice of the peace near the end of the Adams administration, but his commission was not delivered before Thomas Jefferson took office. Jefferson’s Secretary of State, James Madison, refused to deliver it. Marbury asked the Supreme Court to order Madison to act.
Ruling
Chief Justice John Marshall held that Marbury had a right to the commission, but that the Supreme Court could not issue the requested writ because the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 that attempted to give the Court that power conflicted with Article III of the Constitution.
Why It Matters
Marbury v. Madison established judicial review: the principle that federal courts may refuse to apply laws that violate the Constitution. The decision made the Constitution an enforceable limit on Congress and the President and turned the Supreme Court into a central interpreter of constitutional meaning.
Related Ideas