Judicial Branch

Judicial icon

Learn how federal courts interpret law, resolve disputes, and review government action.

The judicial branch decides what federal law means and whether government action fits within the Constitution. This guide explains district courts, appeals courts, the Supreme Court, judicial review, federal judges, landmark cases, and practical court resources.

“It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”

— John Marshall

Highest Court

The Supreme Court

Nine justices decide a small number of cases each term. Their opinions explain federal law, resolve constitutional disputes, and bind lower federal courts.

Read the Supreme Court overview

How a federal case moves

Most federal cases begin in district court, move to an appeals court only if a party challenges the result, and reach the Supreme Court only in rare circumstances. Each stage asks a different question: what happened, whether the law was applied correctly, and whether a larger legal issue needs national resolution.

District courts hear trials

Facts are developed, evidence is presented, witnesses testify, and a judge or jury reaches a decision.

Appeals courts review law

Appeals judges review records and briefs to decide whether the lower court made a legal error.

The Supreme Court selects cases

Justices usually choose cases that involve major national questions or conflicts between lower courts.

“The Constitution is what the judges say it is.”

— Charles Evans Hughes

Judicial review

Judicial review allows federal courts to decide whether laws, regulations, and executive actions comply with the Constitution and the statutes Congress passed.

Federal judges

Article III judges are nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and serve during good behavior so they can decide cases without electoral pressure.

How to use this page

Use Judicial Branch without getting lost.

Use this page to distinguish trial courts, appeals courts, Supreme Court review, judicial review, and the records that explain each step.

Start with facts A legal rule makes more sense after the dispute, parties, lower-court path, and question are clear.
Separate holding from impact The decision answers a legal question; later cases, agencies, and public institutions shape the impact.
Use official opinions For exact language, read the Court opinion or official court record rather than a summary.
Check jurisdiction Federal, state, trial, appeals, and Supreme Court records answer different questions.

Official starting points

Use these sources to check current text, records, deadlines, forms, votes, rules, or public notices.

Find A Case

Search by case name, year, constitutional question, ruling, impact, or related topic.

1954 · U.S. Supreme CourtBrown v. Board of EducationThe decision reshaped constitutional law, public education, civil rights enforcement, and the relationship between courts and state governments.Open case 2010 · U.S. Supreme CourtCitizens United v. Federal Election CommissionThe decision reshaped campaign finance and political spending through outside groups.Open case 2022 · U.S. Supreme CourtDobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health OrganizationThe decision returned most abortion regulation to states and changed the constitutional landscape around substantive due process.Open case 1857 · U.S. Supreme CourtDred Scott v. SandfordThe decision is widely regarded as one of the Court’s worst decisions and helped intensify the conflict that led to the Civil War.Open case 1824 · U.S. Supreme CourtGibbons v. OgdenThe case helped define national power over interstate commerce and the limits of conflicting state action.Open case 1963 · U.S. Supreme CourtGideon v. WainwrightThe decision made the right to appointed counsel a basic requirement of fair criminal procedure.Open case 1803 · U.S. Supreme CourtMarbury v. MadisonMarbury v. Madison established judicial review: the principle that federal courts may refuse to apply laws that violate the Constitution. The decision made the Constitution an enforceable limit on Congress and the President and turned the Supreme Court into a central interpreter of constitutional meaning.Open case 1819 · U.S. Supreme CourtMcCulloch v. MarylandThe decision strengthened national power and became a foundation for understanding implied powers and federal supremacy.Open case 1966 · U.S. Supreme CourtMiranda v. ArizonaThe decision reshaped police interrogation and made Miranda warnings part of public legal culture.Open case 2015 · U.S. Supreme CourtObergefell v. HodgesThe decision nationalized marriage equality and linked liberty and equality principles.Open case 1896 · U.S. Supreme CourtPlessy v. FergusonThe decision allowed Jim Crow segregation to continue until later civil rights decisions rejected its logic.Open case 1973 · U.S. Supreme CourtRoe v. WadeThe decision shaped abortion law for nearly fifty years before being overruled by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.Open case 2013 · U.S. Supreme CourtShelby County v. HolderThe decision changed federal voting-rights enforcement and shifted many disputes to litigation after laws take effect.Open case 1969 · U.S. Supreme CourtTinker v. Des MoinesThe decision remains a leading case on student speech and school authority.Open case 1974 · U.S. Supreme CourtUnited States v. NixonThe decision reinforced judicial authority and limits on presidential power.Open case 1952 · U.S. Supreme CourtYoungstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. SawyerThe case is a key example of judicial limits on presidential authority and separation of powers.Open case